ChartsView - Stock Trading Community

GKP - Research

More
13 years 4 months ago #2497 by Jackozy
Replied by Jackozy on topic GKP
I understand what you're getting at diver. Perhaps I'm being a pedant but all I'm saying is that a C wave of any degree ought consist of 5 subwaves, so your wave down from the triangle to 139.25p needs to have 5 subwaves not 3. It's just a technicality.

I actually think that the whole drop from 450p (465p depending on which chart package you use) counts better as a double with the 139.25 to 260p move as an X wave ie 450-139 as an ABC zigzag (5-3-5), 139-260 as an X, 260 downwards as another ABC per your labelling.

All open to interpretation though...

One thing I'm fairly sure of is that we'll see below 170p at some point.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
13 years 4 months ago #2496 by diver993
Replied by diver993 on topic GKP
Jackozy, the retrace to 139 is the first wave of an ABC which can be either a zigzag or a flat, dependent on what the current C wave does.
The 114 level is merely a fib extension in the present ((a)) & ((b))but happens to coincide nicely with the 76.4 retrace of the entire move from 5.75ish to 465.00 and has been a consistent support/res area thru 2009, 2010, and 2011.
Let's see what happens. It's all moving our way for the present. Take care and have a great Christmas.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Jackozy

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
13 years 4 months ago #2481 by Jackozy
Replied by Jackozy on topic GKP
Hi Diver,

I'm looking towards the main trendline from the 10p days which stands at around 138p today. 140/1 has been very significant in the past so it that level goes then I'd look to 87p personally.

An observation re your waves:

In your wave A down to 139.25p you've labelled the subwave c as an abc - a C wave must have 5 subwaves (ie your wave A has been counted as a 3-3-3 but it should be either a 3-3-5 or a 5-3-5).

In general I agree that it needs to go lower to complete any pattern. The only thing about 114p is that it's not really a major support (111.75p was a support once a while back) so it doesn't seem significant to me. I wonder...where is the 161.8% extension of wave ((a))? It might be somewhere near 87p perhaps (I haven't checked)?
The following user(s) said Thank You: remo, WaveSurfer

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
13 years 4 months ago #2465 by Amo
Replied by Amo on topic GKP
Hasn't the trendline you have put in been broken?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
13 years 4 months ago #2464 by diver993
Replied by diver993 on topic GKP
screencast.com/t/ria55m4OFyh

Does anyone agree with me that this appears to be heading back to 114 to complete and ABC correction from the high of 465? If the current trend line is anything to go by we should be there around the middle of February. The projection to (( c )) is based on an equality with the (( a )) wave from 259.49.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
13 years 4 months ago #2312 by Wreckless Eric
Replied by Wreckless Eric on topic GKP
Just another GKP chart view, short to medium-term more up before more down!?

Diverging trendlines?(based on closing prices).

(in a GKP bull market or GKP bear market? ABC?).

dl.dropbox.com/u/87556809/e40c51f41e9c9a...96eaada98058_png.mht

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: remo
Time to create page: 0.158 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum