- Posts: 519
- Thank you received: 0
GKP
I use fibs as follows:
- 23.6%, 38.2% & 50% retrace = normal retraces as trend/move continues. The shallower the retrace, the stronger the trend.
- between 50% and 61.8% retrace = trend/move in danger of failing/reversing
- more than 61.8% = likely/high risk of 100% retrace of move. Think of the mountain climber! 61.8% is the last point of no return.
I believe that the above is usual for technicians.
I agree with your other points.
Cheers
F4T
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7238706/GULF%20KEYSTONE.png
A fairly standard expectation for a retrace is between the 50 - 61.8% levels; that said it would be normal to expect a retrace to a support in that area - and so we get 57. Of course, there is nothing set in stone and the sp certainly doesn't have to stop there. Obviously, if the 48 fails the downtrend continues and things are really bleak....
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Posts: 519
- Thank you received: 0
you can have a penetration of trendlines intra day but the close is the most important point, so a rise above it to 70 is not a break. Also, a close above can also fail.
I gave a high of 83 on the move up from 42 and my view has not changed. It made 85 so it was a good call. Above that 89.50 is strong resistance, so we now have both 85 and 89.50 as resistance within a few ticks so a break through will need a lot of strength. Where will that come from?
You have to always have an eye on fundamentals whatever the charts say. If you trade long or invest, there has to be fundamental value in the stock or people won;t buy it. If you trade short there needs to be an inherent weakness in the stock to support that stance.
I have said it before and will so again; Firstly, the CPR (at $100+ oil) gave an asset value of 68p. Forget all the bn's OIP BS that went before. It is irrelevant to analysts and the city. Until the reserve report changes then that is the benchmark for the stock no matter how much they produce. Oil is now heading for $40, so the DCF value will be less on a lower forward oil curve.
Also, GKP has a high finding cost and (i think) a high opex/bbl number, so what is their b/e? This is what the analysts will be looking for when the annual report comes out. The RNS re: power/fuel was all about making the market believe that their costs are low. I don;t believe it. Heavy oil, sulpur, trucking costs, security, above average salaries. It all points to high opex.
If opex/bbl is lower than anticipated, expect a rise but not above the resistances in the 80's. If opex/bbl is high IMO this will crash as oil is set to stay low at least until the summer.
The annual report will be interesting and a challenge for the auditors given the management of this company.
Remember, 57 is the 61.8% fib and this was tested today. After that 48.50 is crucial. We have had three lower highs and three lower lows since 85. This is a short term downtrend in addition to the long term one.
My advice is wait for the annual report and react to that.
GL
F4T
Slow Eddie wrote: Was just wondering F4T if the strong downtrend line you have in blue is broken by going above to 70 or more on reasonably strong move would that mean the downtrend is then broken? And a new trend forming?
And can I also ask if your doubts about it going above high 80's ( to which I listen with great attention) are chart based or based on what you mentioned about fundamental values.
I do find it interesting the relation or non relation with fundamental values as I believe most chartists discount them entirely.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Early entry could be a break above 71 but with tight stops as this area is roughly where the main down trend line is(69), well below this but best to go above the strong resistance for entry.
dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/4899609/gkp6thjan2015.png
Resistance..69.75(trendline),,,,71,,,85(200ema and 123 low)
support....50.5(trendline),,,,48.5,,42.5(very strong support)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Posts: 26
- Thank you received: 0
And can I also ask if your doubts about it going above high 80's ( to which I listen with great attention) are chart based or based on what you mentioned about fundamental values.
I do find it interesting the relation or non relation with fundamental values as I believe most chartists discount them entirely.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
My apologies re: changing the software - I was logged on with I.E. instead of my usual Chrome, hence the difference. I.E is weird! For any of you guys posting charts, don't use I.E. as it will force the links to the bottom right-hand corner of your browser and not expand them as you would like.
Happy New Year Chartsview!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
