- Posts: 130
- Thank you received: 0
GKP
Less
More
11 years 3 weeks ago #11938
by SirRichardBunson
Replied by SirRichardBunson on topic GKP
Doh ,,,, having had more time to read your chart Remo and being more awake ,, I can see that you are referring to a back test of the previous t line at 54 and then a retrace would not be good ,,,sorry
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
- Posts: 43
- Thank you received: 0
11 years 3 weeks ago #11937
by Earlgreyhot
Replied by Earlgreyhot on topic GKP
Remo,
At what level do you have your '3' of a 1-2-3 low please? As far back as early Dovember 2013 or more recently??
Thanks
At what level do you have your '3' of a 1-2-3 low please? As far back as early Dovember 2013 or more recently??
Thanks
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
- Posts: 130
- Thank you received: 0
11 years 3 weeks ago #11936
by SirRichardBunson
Replied by SirRichardBunson on topic GKP
A back test respect wont be good.
...............................................
Hi Remo ,,, I just wanted clarify the above ,, as we are not above any t line at the moment I cant see a back test possibility so are you referring to a back test of the recent lows ,,,,,,many thanks
...............................................
Hi Remo ,,, I just wanted clarify the above ,, as we are not above any t line at the moment I cant see a back test possibility so are you referring to a back test of the recent lows ,,,,,,many thanks
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
11 years 3 weeks ago #11935
by remo
This has not officially bottomed...
This has to finish above the down trend line first. This also has the recent triangle resistance above current price.A back test respect wont be good.
Wait for a 123 low formation to signal a possible low.
There is no buy signal as of yet
dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/4899609/gkp2ndfeb2015.png
This has to finish above the down trend line first. This also has the recent triangle resistance above current price.A back test respect wont be good.
Wait for a 123 low formation to signal a possible low.
There is no buy signal as of yet
dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/4899609/gkp2ndfeb2015.png
The following user(s) said Thank You: annes goal, Chaundy1, Libero, Trendfriend, MRA4, Earlgreyhot, psyurmh
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
11 years 4 weeks ago #11924
by Paitech
Replied by Paitech on topic GKP - Good News - Oil and Gas Law Passed
Oil and Gas passed....
Middle East News
Iraq’s Parliament Approves 2015 Budget Following Oil Price Debate
Budget is Based on $56 a Barrel, Lowered From $60 a Barrel in Earlier Drafts
By
Ghassan Adnan and
Nour Malas
Jan. 29, 2015 2:36 p.m. ET
0 COMMENTS
BAGHDAD—Iraq’s parliament has approved the country’s 2015 budget following weeks of debate on lower oil prices and how to write in a landmark oil export deal reached last year between Baghdad and the northern Kurdistan region.
The budget is based on $56 a barrel of crude, lowered from $60 a barrel in earlier drafts. Despite lower projected revenues from oil sales, the budget projects a deficit of $20 billion compared with $40 billion in an earlier version.
The vote Thursday marked a step forward, as rival blocs in parliament agreed to push through a budget that is badly needed for fiscal planning as Iraq’s finances reel from a plunge in global oil prices and a costly military campaign against Islamic extremists.
Iraq didn’t pass a 2014 budget.
Since December, parliament meetings to approve the 2015 draft budget have been bogged down by debate, mostly over what oil price to base the budget on and how to account for exports from the semiautonomous Kurdistan region.
Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi has said this year’s budget would be an austerity budget, focusing on slashing the bloated public sector and freeing up funds for military spending as Iraqi forces battle Islamic State.
Parliament’s economy and investment committee had initially described the draft as “a budget of punishment for the Iraqi people.” Some committee members criticized the draft—which outlines revenue generation under an oil export deal struck in December between Baghdad and the Kurdistan Regional Government—unfairly benefits the Kurdistan region, “while the rest of Iraq suffers austerity.”
Sunnis in parliament, too, had threatened to boycott the vote because the draft budget didn’t include funding provisions for a national guard—a security force meant to empower Sunnis within the Shiite-led government as it fights Islamic State.
Opening the voting session, parliament speaker Salim al-Jabouri said all disagreements over the budget had been resolved. “Iraqis have been waiting for this for a long time,” Mr. Jabouri said.
—Ali A. Nabhan contributed to this article.
Write to Nour Malas at nour.malas@wsj.com
Middle East News
Iraq’s Parliament Approves 2015 Budget Following Oil Price Debate
Budget is Based on $56 a Barrel, Lowered From $60 a Barrel in Earlier Drafts
By
Ghassan Adnan and
Nour Malas
Jan. 29, 2015 2:36 p.m. ET
0 COMMENTS
BAGHDAD—Iraq’s parliament has approved the country’s 2015 budget following weeks of debate on lower oil prices and how to write in a landmark oil export deal reached last year between Baghdad and the northern Kurdistan region.
The budget is based on $56 a barrel of crude, lowered from $60 a barrel in earlier drafts. Despite lower projected revenues from oil sales, the budget projects a deficit of $20 billion compared with $40 billion in an earlier version.
The vote Thursday marked a step forward, as rival blocs in parliament agreed to push through a budget that is badly needed for fiscal planning as Iraq’s finances reel from a plunge in global oil prices and a costly military campaign against Islamic extremists.
Iraq didn’t pass a 2014 budget.
Since December, parliament meetings to approve the 2015 draft budget have been bogged down by debate, mostly over what oil price to base the budget on and how to account for exports from the semiautonomous Kurdistan region.
Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi has said this year’s budget would be an austerity budget, focusing on slashing the bloated public sector and freeing up funds for military spending as Iraqi forces battle Islamic State.
Parliament’s economy and investment committee had initially described the draft as “a budget of punishment for the Iraqi people.” Some committee members criticized the draft—which outlines revenue generation under an oil export deal struck in December between Baghdad and the Kurdistan Regional Government—unfairly benefits the Kurdistan region, “while the rest of Iraq suffers austerity.”
Sunnis in parliament, too, had threatened to boycott the vote because the draft budget didn’t include funding provisions for a national guard—a security force meant to empower Sunnis within the Shiite-led government as it fights Islamic State.
Opening the voting session, parliament speaker Salim al-Jabouri said all disagreements over the budget had been resolved. “Iraqis have been waiting for this for a long time,” Mr. Jabouri said.
—Ali A. Nabhan contributed to this article.
Write to Nour Malas at nour.malas@wsj.com
The following user(s) said Thank You: Libero
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: remo
Time to create page: 0.143 seconds
