- Posts: 195
- Thank you received: 412
GKP - Research
13 years 3 months ago #3132
by Monkeyz
Morning F4T,
Appreciate your comments.
230 is naturally the gap and had served as previous support in October of this year. It would also coincide with the length of the rise from the move up from 163 to 187 (24pts) and if we measure my presumed low of 205 + 24 = 229.
Agree that this move is a little overextended and it would be healthy for some of the heat to come off the indicators.
All the best,
M.
Appreciate your comments.
230 is naturally the gap and had served as previous support in October of this year. It would also coincide with the length of the rise from the move up from 163 to 187 (24pts) and if we measure my presumed low of 205 + 24 = 229.
Agree that this move is a little overextended and it would be healthy for some of the heat to come off the indicators.
All the best,
M.
The following user(s) said Thank You: remo
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Food4Thought
-
- Offline
- Senior Poster
-
Less
More
- Posts: 519
- Thank you received: 1017
13 years 3 months ago #3129
by Food4Thought
Replied by Food4Thought on topic GKP
Hi Monkeyz,
why a rise to 229/230? - 217 area has has been tested twice and 3 is an important number in trading, gap is next real target / resistance area and engulfing candle yesterday suggests a further rise.
Why 217? - 217 area has shown resistance in past and on this rise - resistance becomes support.
Why 210? - natural number for an overshoot of 217 IMO,psychological round number, some consolidation there in recent days so makes a good bounce point.
This move from 162 is also a little overextended. It needs to give some back before possibly going higher. The gap is a sensible and strong resistance target to suck in a few more excited PI bulls before smart money reduces.
All IMO of course.
F4T
why a rise to 229/230? - 217 area has has been tested twice and 3 is an important number in trading, gap is next real target / resistance area and engulfing candle yesterday suggests a further rise.
Why 217? - 217 area has shown resistance in past and on this rise - resistance becomes support.
Why 210? - natural number for an overshoot of 217 IMO,psychological round number, some consolidation there in recent days so makes a good bounce point.
This move from 162 is also a little overextended. It needs to give some back before possibly going higher. The gap is a sensible and strong resistance target to suck in a few more excited PI bulls before smart money reduces.
All IMO of course.
F4T
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
13 years 3 months ago #3114
by Monkeyz
Hi F4T,
Out of interest what are your reasons for 210/217 based on?
I had an order at 202 this morning - too greedy for my own good! However have since moved this down to 189 based on the original breakout point but also bearing in mind any fibonacci retrace of this particular move up.
I saw Jackozy's posts on iii and tend to agree with his thinking. Although I don't trade based on EWT the move down to 173 was uncanny and if applying a fib extension of the move then wave 3 did not disappoint.
Keen to hear you thoughts,
M.
Out of interest what are your reasons for 210/217 based on?
I had an order at 202 this morning - too greedy for my own good! However have since moved this down to 189 based on the original breakout point but also bearing in mind any fibonacci retrace of this particular move up.
I saw Jackozy's posts on iii and tend to agree with his thinking. Although I don't trade based on EWT the move down to 173 was uncanny and if applying a fib extension of the move then wave 3 did not disappoint.
Keen to hear you thoughts,
M.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Food4Thought
-
- Offline
- Senior Poster
-
Less
More
- Posts: 519
- Thank you received: 1017
13 years 3 months ago #3104
by Food4Thought
Replied by Food4Thought on topic GKP
Next sell point is at gap close 229-230 IMO. I then expect a retrace, possibly as low as 210, but to 217 certainly.
GL all
F4T
GL all
F4T
The following user(s) said Thank You: Amo
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- annes goal
-
- Offline
- Junior Boarder
-
Less
More
- Posts: 192
- Thank you received: 269
13 years 3 months ago #3097
by annes goal
Replied by annes goal on topic GKP
So, in fact then I should be quite pleased - when I saw it wasn't taken I managed to get a few at 204.69! Ok - not so bad after all then. Thanks for explaining it all
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: remo
Time to create page: 0.198 seconds
