- Posts: 519
- Thank you received: 1017
GKP - Research
- Food4Thought
-
- Offline
- Senior Poster
-
Less
More
13 years 2 months ago - 13 years 2 months ago #4074
by Food4Thought
Replied by Food4Thought on topic GKP
I am doing BIG charts today, so here's my big GKP chart.
The chart tells me that it is well worth waiting for rising long term support, currently in the 171/172 area. SP has bounced off falling resistance twice already and GKP is weak atm.
I am looking for general weakness to appear in the broad markets to ensure my entry.
We will see eh!
F4T
uk.advfn.com/p.php?pid=chartscreenshot&u...BkbAzqHUErFUj8cyYNdp
The chart tells me that it is well worth waiting for rising long term support, currently in the 171/172 area. SP has bounced off falling resistance twice already and GKP is weak atm.
I am looking for general weakness to appear in the broad markets to ensure my entry.
We will see eh!
F4T
uk.advfn.com/p.php?pid=chartscreenshot&u...BkbAzqHUErFUj8cyYNdp
Last edit: 13 years 2 months ago by Food4Thought.
The following user(s) said Thank You: SirRichardBunson, annes goal, skipper10, Jackozy, Syrian Empire
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
13 years 2 months ago #3850
by Jackozy
Hi F4T,
I think we're in agreement. The bounce from 195p looks like a wave B up of 2 down to me so I'm also looking towards 187p.
Cheers
I think we're in agreement. The bounce from 195p looks like a wave B up of 2 down to me so I'm also looking towards 187p.
Cheers
The following user(s) said Thank You: Food4Thought, Tejassi
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
13 years 2 months ago #3849
by Jackozy
Hi SE,
There are always option with wave counts so they should always carry a caveat emptor.
IN GKP's case the whole move from 139.25p to 260p and back to 161p is bizarre and very difficult from an EWT perspective. What seems to have clarified things is the move up from 161p to 228p which looks a lot like 5 waves (and, indeed, all the subwaves are perfect in respect of the textbook retracements). If that's the case then an initial 5 wave sequence in a trend change cannot be the last move in that direction.
As I've posted previously, it's now my belief that 161p was probably the bottom (I did earlier think that, given the 139p to 260p there could be a retrace to 139p or lower). Whether the bounce off 195p holds or not I'm not sure.
A 50% retrace is enough for a wave 2 down but what's throwing me for now is that the dip to 195p is not reflected in the hourly chart as the mid-price only went to about 197/8p. This means that the hourly chart has a less than 50% retrace which is usually not enough for a wave 2. For these reasons I still think it's possible that a retrace to 187p may still be possible. Whether it could go beyond that in the event of a large general market correction we'll probably only know with hindsight I'm afraid.
There are always option with wave counts so they should always carry a caveat emptor.
IN GKP's case the whole move from 139.25p to 260p and back to 161p is bizarre and very difficult from an EWT perspective. What seems to have clarified things is the move up from 161p to 228p which looks a lot like 5 waves (and, indeed, all the subwaves are perfect in respect of the textbook retracements). If that's the case then an initial 5 wave sequence in a trend change cannot be the last move in that direction.
As I've posted previously, it's now my belief that 161p was probably the bottom (I did earlier think that, given the 139p to 260p there could be a retrace to 139p or lower). Whether the bounce off 195p holds or not I'm not sure.
A 50% retrace is enough for a wave 2 down but what's throwing me for now is that the dip to 195p is not reflected in the hourly chart as the mid-price only went to about 197/8p. This means that the hourly chart has a less than 50% retrace which is usually not enough for a wave 2. For these reasons I still think it's possible that a retrace to 187p may still be possible. Whether it could go beyond that in the event of a large general market correction we'll probably only know with hindsight I'm afraid.
The following user(s) said Thank You: annes goal, cautious tone
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Food4Thought
-
- Offline
- Senior Poster
-
Less
More
- Posts: 519
- Thank you received: 1017
13 years 2 months ago - 13 years 2 months ago #3848
by Food4Thought
Replied by Food4Thought on topic GKP
Things are getting interesting again. Lovely dark cloud cover yesterday after the indices finally submitted to a much needed retrace, which is not over yet. Once S&P broke 1505 the rest was just exhaustion.
With GKP we back tested the neckline of the H&S on the last rise from 195 spike down (50% retrace of 161 move) and now everything points nicely down. First target still 187 and rising long term support is now in the 169/170 area so traders can forget about 161 IMO. It should be history.
If long term support at 170 does break then so will 161 and I would expect at least 141, but I don't think that will happen unless the CC gloes very tits up.
So, in summary, this is a sell down to minimum 187 and a strong buy at 170 if we get there. I think we might just do that as I see the indices giving back some more and GKP is always weak in that environment.
Cheers
F4T
With GKP we back tested the neckline of the H&S on the last rise from 195 spike down (50% retrace of 161 move) and now everything points nicely down. First target still 187 and rising long term support is now in the 169/170 area so traders can forget about 161 IMO. It should be history.
If long term support at 170 does break then so will 161 and I would expect at least 141, but I don't think that will happen unless the CC gloes very tits up.
So, in summary, this is a sell down to minimum 187 and a strong buy at 170 if we get there. I think we might just do that as I see the indices giving back some more and GKP is always weak in that environment.
Cheers
F4T
Last edit: 13 years 2 months ago by Food4Thought.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Syrian Empire
-
- Offline
- Fresh Boarder
-
Less
More
- Posts: 63
- Thank you received: 49
13 years 2 months ago #3835
by Syrian Empire
Replied by Syrian Empire on topic GKP
Jackozy - If the DOW tanks and takes the markets with it - how does this impact your Wave count on GKP? Does this bring 161 back into play?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
13 years 2 months ago #3595
by Jackozy
We agree again F4T!
If you believe in the fractal nature of price charts then they should appear on any timeframe.
Perhaps of more relevance is where in the chart they appear. For me, an H&S needs to be at the top of an uptrend and vice versa for an inverse H&S. That could be the top (or bottom) of a trend on the 5 min chart or the weekly chart, just as long as it's not in the middle of a trend. In that respect, they should be near important supports or resistances (on the relevant timeframe) or have clear divergences at the heads.
If you believe in the fractal nature of price charts then they should appear on any timeframe.
Perhaps of more relevance is where in the chart they appear. For me, an H&S needs to be at the top of an uptrend and vice versa for an inverse H&S. That could be the top (or bottom) of a trend on the 5 min chart or the weekly chart, just as long as it's not in the middle of a trend. In that respect, they should be near important supports or resistances (on the relevant timeframe) or have clear divergences at the heads.
The following user(s) said Thank You: remo, wild13, Broad-rock, Food4Thought, Libero, Wreckless Eric
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: remo
Time to create page: 0.160 seconds
