- Posts: 262
- Thank you received: 0
XEL
Less
More
13 years 1 day ago #4350
by waverider2
Replied by waverider2 on topic XEL
A close above 102.5 is very significant.
Ichimoku Trader has today confirmed today was a strong signal.
dl.dropbox.com/u/4385922/XEL_ichimoku.png
All the best to my fellow long term holders. It could be turning to some heavy duty movements...
Ichimoku Trader has today confirmed today was a strong signal.
dl.dropbox.com/u/4385922/XEL_ichimoku.png
All the best to my fellow long term holders. It could be turning to some heavy duty movements...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
13 years 4 days ago #4313
by Jackozy
Keep an eye on this today - looks like it's making a move. Still needs to close above 110-112.5p to open up target at 139p resistance:
dl.dropbox.com/u/20815047/XELdaily22_02_13.gif
dl.dropbox.com/u/20815047/XELdaily22_02_13.gif
The following user(s) said Thank You: remo, SirRichardBunson, annes goal, Mark PB, Moiz, Wreckless Eric, cautious tone, ajl0204, Syrian Empire
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
13 years 3 weeks ago #3847
by Jackozy
Hi Broad-rock,
Sorry for not coming back to you on this earlier.
In this particular case (XEL), yes, I was referring to the RSI downtrend formed from the bearish divergence at the recent 139p high.
In general, I find that RSI trendlines work reasonably well but only when they form from either a bullish or a bearish divergence. Breakouts from these RSI trendlines can be false (I have some guidelines to tell me when to expect these) so it's always a good idea to sell the first resistance.
There's a bit more to this which I've not yet ironed out so I don't want to say much more, just that in the past I've noticed that there have been false price breakouts in some shares but the RSI trendlines have worked perfectly and I would not have been caught out if I'd followed RSI rather than price.
It's a bit of a work in progress.
ATB
Broad-rock wrote: Hi Jackozy,
Can I ask about the RSI back test you mentioned ? (this is only valid if the RSI trend is formed from a divergence).
I think you mean the divergence at the top and not the bottom.
Hi Broad-rock,
Sorry for not coming back to you on this earlier.
In this particular case (XEL), yes, I was referring to the RSI downtrend formed from the bearish divergence at the recent 139p high.
In general, I find that RSI trendlines work reasonably well but only when they form from either a bullish or a bearish divergence. Breakouts from these RSI trendlines can be false (I have some guidelines to tell me when to expect these) so it's always a good idea to sell the first resistance.
There's a bit more to this which I've not yet ironed out so I don't want to say much more, just that in the past I've noticed that there have been false price breakouts in some shares but the RSI trendlines have worked perfectly and I would not have been caught out if I'd followed RSI rather than price.
It's a bit of a work in progress.
ATB
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
13 years 3 weeks ago #3843
by Monkeyz
The following user(s) said Thank You: waverider2
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
- Posts: 262
- Thank you received: 0
13 years 3 weeks ago #3841
by waverider2
Replied by waverider2 on topic XEL
Please can someone confirm the closing mid price for xel today?
Many thanks
Many thanks
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
- Posts: 92
- Thank you received: 0
13 years 3 weeks ago #3810
by Broad-rock
Replied by Broad-rock on topic XEL
Hi Jackozy,
Can I ask about the RSI back test you mentioned ? (this is only valid if the RSI trend is formed from a divergence).
I think you mean the divergence at the top and not the bottom.
Can I ask about the RSI back test you mentioned ? (this is only valid if the RSI trend is formed from a divergence).
I think you mean the divergence at the top and not the bottom.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: remo
Time to create page: 0.093 seconds
