- Posts: 368
- Thank you received: 0
GEMD
13 years 3 months ago #1806
by Shotry
Thanks LTV, I'd really appreciate more input as I can see your reasoning very well and understanding the validity of the different trendlines could make a big difference to our results. I remain out of this trade for the moment. Spread isn't great at 3.5p ish.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
- Posts: 324
- Thank you received: 0
13 years 3 months ago #1803
by longterm_view
Replied by longterm_view on topic GEMD
I used July, as there were 5 touches. I believe the more touches the better the trendline.
I couldn’t match it up well enough from the March high.
This is where this website could become excellent in learning.
I dont know which trenline is more valid! Remo?
Anybody help would be appreciated?
I couldn’t match it up well enough from the March high.
This is where this website could become excellent in learning.
I dont know which trenline is more valid! Remo?
Anybody help would be appreciated?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
13 years 3 months ago #1800
by Shotry
I'll keep an eye on it LTV. Added to my POG position this morning as the chart looks v good.
I'm interested in learning how others place their trendlines, you've drawn yours from early July, whereas I'd put mine in from March, which might explain the differences between what we're seeing. I'd love to know which trendline was more valid? My chart looks a little different from yours (these kind of differences are worrying as this is supposed to be objective data), but if I draw my trendline from early July as you have I get a very similar picture? Would love input on this?
I'm interested in learning how others place their trendlines, you've drawn yours from early July, whereas I'd put mine in from March, which might explain the differences between what we're seeing. I'd love to know which trendline was more valid? My chart looks a little different from yours (these kind of differences are worrying as this is supposed to be objective data), but if I draw my trendline from early July as you have I get a very similar picture? Would love input on this?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
- Posts: 324
- Thank you received: 0
13 years 3 months ago #1798
by longterm_view
Replied by longterm_view on topic GEMD
Shorty,
Had a quick look, i'm not sure its broken out.
Stops at 148 look good.
dl.dropbox.com/u/21384991/Gem%20Diamonds...1.12%20%28DFB%29.png
On my daily chart the RSI hasn’t broken out?
I would think you need a close above the daily trendline (blue). Around 168.4.
Targets 179 (hor) 196.91 (200ema) 199. horizontal.
Had a quick look, i'm not sure its broken out.
Stops at 148 look good.
dl.dropbox.com/u/21384991/Gem%20Diamonds...1.12%20%28DFB%29.png
On my daily chart the RSI hasn’t broken out?
I would think you need a close above the daily trendline (blue). Around 168.4.
Targets 179 (hor) 196.91 (200ema) 199. horizontal.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Shotry
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
13 years 3 months ago #1794
by Shotry
Weekly suggests we're on the edge of a break up from a descending wedge (I've annotated the chart with stops/targets. Would very much appreciate others views
screencast.com/t/yMBMbwzEcc3j
Daily confirms the weekly view with a finish above 164 being bullish. I've annotated the chart. If it breaks up, then it might be reasonable to place stops closer to 160 than the 148 suggested on the weekly chart. If that's reasonable the risk reward is very good.
screencast.com/t/apmtJTaaj8b7
screencast.com/t/yMBMbwzEcc3j
Daily confirms the weekly view with a finish above 164 being bullish. I've annotated the chart. If it breaks up, then it might be reasonable to place stops closer to 160 than the 148 suggested on the weekly chart. If that's reasonable the risk reward is very good.
screencast.com/t/apmtJTaaj8b7
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: remo
Time to create page: 0.081 seconds
