- Posts: 3158
- Thank you received: 3
Gold
13 years 1 month ago #2885
by remo
Yep..
It's good for an early entry.
But the main one comes on the daily chart.
And above the top of the hammer can be classed as a 123 low breakout.
That will be similar to the 4 hourly level.
It's good for an early entry.
But the main one comes on the daily chart.
And above the top of the hammer can be classed as a 123 low breakout.
That will be similar to the 4 hourly level.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Rossymc
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
13 years 1 month ago #2884
by Rossymc
The following user(s) said Thank You: remo
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
13 years 1 month ago #2880
by remo
The following user(s) said Thank You: Broad-rock
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
13 years 1 month ago #2855
by remo
The following user(s) said Thank You: ElusiveSteve
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
13 years 1 month ago #2851
by Jackozy
Hi Nev,
Interesting possibility. On that count you've got wave 2 retracing to the 78.6% Fib of wave 1 and wave 4 retracing slightly beyond the 61.8% Fib of the wave 3 which goes against the guideline of alternation.
I know it's only a guideline, not a rule, of EWT but it seems a little harsh to me. Plus the 1795 recent high came with a bearish RSI divergence on the daily which, in my experience, tends to suggest a wave 5 top. The following 61.8% retrace would then make sense as a larger degree wave 2 down.
All IMHO and could be wrong!
Interesting possibility. On that count you've got wave 2 retracing to the 78.6% Fib of wave 1 and wave 4 retracing slightly beyond the 61.8% Fib of the wave 3 which goes against the guideline of alternation.
I know it's only a guideline, not a rule, of EWT but it seems a little harsh to me. Plus the 1795 recent high came with a bearish RSI divergence on the daily which, in my experience, tends to suggest a wave 5 top. The following 61.8% retrace would then make sense as a larger degree wave 2 down.
All IMHO and could be wrong!
The following user(s) said Thank You: wild13
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
13 years 1 month ago #2842
by followNev
I was thinking more along the lines of this.
Jackozy wrote: I'm really surprised that nobody followed up on this after the close on Friday night. A whopping great hammer right at multiple supports with possible bullish RSI and MACD divergences forming:
dl.dropbox.com/u/20815047/Golddaily06_01_13.gif
If this does follow through then a bounce off a 61.8% Fib is strongly suggestive of a wave 3 to come. Resistances at 1695, 1723, 1754, 1767 (trendline) and 1796 initially.
I was thinking more along the lines of this.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: remo
Time to create page: 0.099 seconds
