- Posts: 130
- Thank you received: 0
GKP
Less
More
11 years 2 months ago #11699
by SirRichardBunson
Replied by SirRichardBunson on topic GKP
Yes your right Count should have read 12,,26,,9 thanks
SRB
SRB
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
11 years 2 months ago #11698
by Count
I always thought 12 26 9 were the standard MACD settings....dohhh am I wrong?, which have already gone red.
Bounced off low of 65 so far today, which is very close to MA50 (currently 64.4) and an oblique minor support (~63.75).
Bounced off low of 65 so far today, which is very close to MA50 (currently 64.4) and an oblique minor support (~63.75).
The following user(s) said Thank You: SirRichardBunson
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
- Posts: 130
- Thank you received: 0
11 years 2 months ago - 11 years 2 months ago #11697
by SirRichardBunson
Replied by SirRichardBunson on topic GKP
KK, Thanks for your thoughts just a couple of questions for you,,,,,,,,,
1. I have heard of volume/price/momentum oscillators but I have never heard of the Chaos Awesome Oscillator before can you enlarge on what its based on please.
2. You don't use the standard settings (8,17,9) for your macd is that to give you and earlier indication of it turning or something else.
Many thanks
SRB
1. I have heard of volume/price/momentum oscillators but I have never heard of the Chaos Awesome Oscillator before can you enlarge on what its based on please.
2. You don't use the standard settings (8,17,9) for your macd is that to give you and earlier indication of it turning or something else.
Many thanks
SRB
Last edit: 11 years 2 months ago by SirRichardBunson.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
11 years 2 months ago #11696
by KoolKeith
Hey y'all,
Here's the chart I posted on the 11th November, I did think the resilience of the shareprice may take it a little higher to 92p area (shoulda stuck to this view!!!(remember cautiously bullish, doh!)), which would have made things easier moving forward - knowing it had taken out 89.75p - it didn't, so I feel this count is right and v waves up completed.
So my views are with this count and this chart - we have retraced pretty much to 50% fib but odds on we retrace to 61.8% fib around 58/59p for correction and end of wave 2 as I would like to see indicator turn red to confirm count - this is all assuming that the bottom is in and this is not a larger ABC correction in prevailing downtrend, as opposed to waiting for an impulse 3 upwards. Absolute confirmation though is not breaching low in the 40's! Law - wave 2 cannot go below 1, just can't see it though.
Updated chart:
GLA
Here's the chart I posted on the 11th November, I did think the resilience of the shareprice may take it a little higher to 92p area (shoulda stuck to this view!!!(remember cautiously bullish, doh!)), which would have made things easier moving forward - knowing it had taken out 89.75p - it didn't, so I feel this count is right and v waves up completed.
So my views are with this count and this chart - we have retraced pretty much to 50% fib but odds on we retrace to 61.8% fib around 58/59p for correction and end of wave 2 as I would like to see indicator turn red to confirm count - this is all assuming that the bottom is in and this is not a larger ABC correction in prevailing downtrend, as opposed to waiting for an impulse 3 upwards. Absolute confirmation though is not breaching low in the 40's! Law - wave 2 cannot go below 1, just can't see it though.
Updated chart:
GLA
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
- Posts: 14
- Thank you received: 0
11 years 3 months ago #11678
by Andrew2013
Replied by Andrew2013 on topic GKP
Would you not say this has already technically broken out of its long term downtrend and just waiting for a 123 low break and close above 89.75? or are my drawings wrong ?
gyazo.com/af37236972c6b81336cac9e0ede8e091
gyazo.com/af37236972c6b81336cac9e0ede8e091
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: remo
Time to create page: 0.139 seconds
