- Posts: 130
- Thank you received: 0
GKP
Less
More
13 years 6 days ago #4246
by SirRichardBunson
Replied by SirRichardBunson on topic GKP
Morning WaveSurfer,
Just a quick note, were you on the vino when you wrote your 20.49 post yesterday as Im struggling.
Tight Lines SRB
Just a quick note, were you on the vino when you wrote your 20.49 post yesterday as Im struggling.
Tight Lines SRB
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
- Posts: 634
- Thank you received: 0
13 years 6 days ago #4245
by WaveSurfer
Replied by WaveSurfer on topic GKP
a new oil discovery on Barkman, sweet light oil. should get this going.... usually its sells off on more oil found lol.
www.londonstockexchange.com/exchange/new...ouncementId=11494587
lets see how the action unfolds..
www.londonstockexchange.com/exchange/new...ouncementId=11494587
lets see how the action unfolds..
The following user(s) said Thank You: SirRichardBunson, Syrian Empire
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
- Posts: 634
- Thank you received: 0
13 years 1 week ago #4239
by WaveSurfer
Replied by WaveSurfer on topic GKP
guys looks like GKP is putting in a few nested 1-2's and from where i'm looking this could indicate a big move north is due, possibly the wave that every man and his dog wants to get in on. what wave could that be then ?
dont meant mean it cant get to 196/187, it'll still remain bull. however close below 198 consecutively - i'd start look at alternatives.
dont meant mean it cant get to 196/187, it'll still remain bull. however close below 198 consecutively - i'd start look at alternatives.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
13 years 1 week ago #4238
by Jackozy
Lol!
Diver, I don't want you to either ramp it or de-ramp it mate. I just want your analysis
It won't surprise you to learn that, at first glance, I've got some issues with your count on your latest link. If you've got wave A down to 141p, B up to 260p then your wave C down from there needs to be a motive wave (ie a 5) rather than the corrective form you're counting.
I'll have a further think about it and get back to you tomorrow. You've got some complicated corrective patterns going on and they're never easy to interpret!
Diver, I don't want you to either ramp it or de-ramp it mate. I just want your analysis
It won't surprise you to learn that, at first glance, I've got some issues with your count on your latest link. If you've got wave A down to 141p, B up to 260p then your wave C down from there needs to be a motive wave (ie a 5) rather than the corrective form you're counting.
I'll have a further think about it and get back to you tomorrow. You've got some complicated corrective patterns going on and they're never easy to interpret!
The following user(s) said Thank You: diver993
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
13 years 1 week ago #4230
by diver993
Ok Jacko, in true ladylike manner, I've changed my mind again. I've had a bit of time this afternoon and spent a fair proportion looking at this chart.
My conclusion is as follows.....
screencast.com/t/o2DjT4EW
So as to avoid any mishaps and confusion I'm only posting this link.... from ( B ) we go skyward to those fluffy clouds of which dreams are made ....... I, and thousands of other PI's, hope
. If you really want me to ramp it up I go for £8
My conclusion is as follows.....
screencast.com/t/o2DjT4EW
So as to avoid any mishaps and confusion I'm only posting this link.... from ( B ) we go skyward to those fluffy clouds of which dreams are made ....... I, and thousands of other PI's, hope
The following user(s) said Thank You: Jackozy
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: remo
Time to create page: 0.153 seconds
