- Posts: 3190
- Thank you received: 5652
My view on USD/jpy
1 month 1 week ago - 1 month 1 week ago #18444
by remo
Replied by remo on topic My view on USD/jpy
Last edit: 1 month 1 week ago by remo.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Libero
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
1 month 1 week ago #18443
by remo
Replied by remo on topic My view on USD/jpy
Hi LeilaX
Im not an expert on fundamentals but this may help you..
AI Perspective
Where we are today: The BoJ just held rates at 0.75% today as expected — unanimous consensus among 51 economists surveyed by Bloomberg Bloomberg. USD/JPY is sitting at ~159.65, and analysts say Ueda's press conference remarks will be key to whether we swing past 160 Bloomberg. The 52-week range has been 139.88 to 159.91 Investing.com, so we're essentially at the top of the yearly range.
The intervention question is more nuanced this time. Your instinct about 160 as the pain threshold is right historically, but the dynamics have shifted. Reuters reported last week that Japan likely has less scope to intervene now than in 2022/2024. Back then, intervention targeted speculative carry-trade selling — this time the yen weakness is driven by genuine safe-haven dollar demand and oil import fears tied to the Iran conflict WTAQ News Talk. That's a crucial distinction. Japanese policymakers privately acknowledge that intervening now could prove futile since dollar demand would just intensify if the war persists WTAQ News Talk.
Nikkei Asia echoed this — market participants are "largely unconcerned" about intervention even as we approach 160, because speculative short-yen positioning has apparently stayed low Nikkei Asia. Without the speculative element, Tokyo's G7 justification for stepping in is weaker.
That said, the verbal warnings are escalating. Japan and South Korea issued a rare joint statement expressing "serious concern" over rapid JPY and KRW depreciation, and Finance Minister Katayama confirmed closer-than-usual contact with US authorities FXStreet. In January, when USD/JPY was pushing hard, the NY Fed reportedly called financial institutions asking about yen exchange rates — traders read that as preparation to assist Japanese intervention — and the yen surged 1.75% in a single day to 155.63 The Japan Times. So the threat is real even if follow-through is constrained.
My read on the most likely path:
More upside first, then intervention if it gets disorderly. Here's the logic: the macro drivers you identified (rate gap, oil, geopolitics) are all still firmly in place and the BoJ just held today. Some analysts suggest the yen could drift to 165 if officials don't escalate beyond verbal warnings WTAQ News Talk. But a rate hike could be brought forward from July to April if yen depreciation intensifies and pushes up prices — the BoJ may not say so explicitly but it would be the real motivation WTAQ News Talk.
The scenario I'd watch for: a fast, volatile push through 160 (not a slow grind) would most likely trigger actual intervention. Past episodes show MOF intervention can unwind USD/JPY by 300-400 pips in short order Forex, but historically the pair stabilises and resumes its uptrend. So even if they do step in, it tends to create a dip-buying opportunity rather than a trend reversal — unless the BoJ follows up with an actual rate hike.
The real game-changer isn't intervention, it's whether the BoJ surprises with an April hike. State Street's base case is one hike in 2026 and another in 2027 with a terminal rate of 1.25%, but if yen breaks 160, they see two hikes this year with one potentially as early as April, pushing the terminal to 1.5% CNBC. That would actually shift the trend.
For a trader's perspective: this is a pair where you can be directionally right but still get steamrolled by a 400-pip intervention spike. If you're playing it, tight risk management around the 160 handle is essential. Not a level to be complacent with size.
Im not an expert on fundamentals but this may help you..
AI Perspective
Where we are today: The BoJ just held rates at 0.75% today as expected — unanimous consensus among 51 economists surveyed by Bloomberg Bloomberg. USD/JPY is sitting at ~159.65, and analysts say Ueda's press conference remarks will be key to whether we swing past 160 Bloomberg. The 52-week range has been 139.88 to 159.91 Investing.com, so we're essentially at the top of the yearly range.
The intervention question is more nuanced this time. Your instinct about 160 as the pain threshold is right historically, but the dynamics have shifted. Reuters reported last week that Japan likely has less scope to intervene now than in 2022/2024. Back then, intervention targeted speculative carry-trade selling — this time the yen weakness is driven by genuine safe-haven dollar demand and oil import fears tied to the Iran conflict WTAQ News Talk. That's a crucial distinction. Japanese policymakers privately acknowledge that intervening now could prove futile since dollar demand would just intensify if the war persists WTAQ News Talk.
Nikkei Asia echoed this — market participants are "largely unconcerned" about intervention even as we approach 160, because speculative short-yen positioning has apparently stayed low Nikkei Asia. Without the speculative element, Tokyo's G7 justification for stepping in is weaker.
That said, the verbal warnings are escalating. Japan and South Korea issued a rare joint statement expressing "serious concern" over rapid JPY and KRW depreciation, and Finance Minister Katayama confirmed closer-than-usual contact with US authorities FXStreet. In January, when USD/JPY was pushing hard, the NY Fed reportedly called financial institutions asking about yen exchange rates — traders read that as preparation to assist Japanese intervention — and the yen surged 1.75% in a single day to 155.63 The Japan Times. So the threat is real even if follow-through is constrained.
My read on the most likely path:
More upside first, then intervention if it gets disorderly. Here's the logic: the macro drivers you identified (rate gap, oil, geopolitics) are all still firmly in place and the BoJ just held today. Some analysts suggest the yen could drift to 165 if officials don't escalate beyond verbal warnings WTAQ News Talk. But a rate hike could be brought forward from July to April if yen depreciation intensifies and pushes up prices — the BoJ may not say so explicitly but it would be the real motivation WTAQ News Talk.
The scenario I'd watch for: a fast, volatile push through 160 (not a slow grind) would most likely trigger actual intervention. Past episodes show MOF intervention can unwind USD/JPY by 300-400 pips in short order Forex, but historically the pair stabilises and resumes its uptrend. So even if they do step in, it tends to create a dip-buying opportunity rather than a trend reversal — unless the BoJ follows up with an actual rate hike.
The real game-changer isn't intervention, it's whether the BoJ surprises with an April hike. State Street's base case is one hike in 2026 and another in 2027 with a terminal rate of 1.25%, but if yen breaks 160, they see two hikes this year with one potentially as early as April, pushing the terminal to 1.5% CNBC. That would actually shift the trend.
For a trader's perspective: this is a pair where you can be directionally right but still get steamrolled by a 400-pip intervention spike. If you're playing it, tight risk management around the 160 handle is essential. Not a level to be complacent with size.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
1 month 1 week ago #18441
by LeilaX
My view on USD/jpy was created by LeilaX
USD/JPY pump is largely driven by the widening rate gap btwn the U.S. & Japan. While the Fed keeps rates around 3.50–3.75%, the BoJ is still near 0.75%, pulling flows into USD. Add rising Middle East tensions + higher energy costs, and the yen stays under pressure since Japan imports most of its oil. Now all eyes are on the 160 lvl, often seen as Japan’s “pain threshold,” where fears of govt intervention spike. That mix of macro pressure + psych levels keeps traders on edge. Do you think we get intervention soon or more upside first? Drop your view
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: remo
Time to create page: 0.128 seconds
